M&A · Markets

The consolidation wave: iGaming M&A tops €20bn in 18 months

From Apollo's take-private of a major supplier to the Allwyn–OPAP lottery mega-merger, deal volume across operators, suppliers and affiliates has passed €20bn since the start of 2025.

By Daniel Voss 7 min

iGaming mergers and acquisitions

The online gambling industry is in the middle of its most active consolidation phase in years. Since January 2025, disclosed deal volume across operators, suppliers, affiliates and lottery has passed €20bn — driven by three distinct forces pulling in the same direction.

Private equity moves in

The first is private capital. Infrastructure and buyout funds have identified regulated gambling suppliers as cash-generative, licence-protected assets, and have been willing to take them private at scale. The pattern is familiar from other regulated industries: a listed supplier trading below the multiple its cash flows would command in private hands becomes a target, and a fund with a long hold period steps in.

Lottery’s mega-mergers

The second is lottery consolidation. The combination of Allwyn and OPAP created one of the largest lottery groups in the world by combined value, while other national-lottery operators have been drawn into cross-border tie-ups. Lottery’s appeal is its stability — long licences, predictable revenue, limited channel competition — which is exactly what makes it attractive to the same patient capital chasing suppliers.

Operators buying capability, not just scale

The third force is operators buying capability rather than pure scale. Where an earlier consolidation era was about stitching together customer bases, the current wave is more often about acquiring a specific technology, a market licence, or a product the buyer would otherwise spend years building — prediction-market platforms, payments capability, or a foothold in a newly opened market such as Brazil.

The ticker graveyard

The flip side of a busy deal market is a shrinking pool of listed pure-plays. Several familiar tickers have left public markets over the past two years — through take-privates, mergers, or relistings under new parents. For investors, that thins the universe of ways to get exposure to regulated gambling. For the industry, it concentrates capability in fewer, larger hands — with all the pricing power and platform-standardisation that implies for the suppliers and operators further down the chain.

What consolidation means downstream

For operators and suppliers further down the chain, the wave has consequences beyond the headline deal values. As capability concentrates in fewer, larger groups, the buyers gain pricing power and the standardisation that comes with running more of the market on shared technology — a dynamic that can squeeze the smaller platform, content and payments providers that once competed on independence. A private-equity owner with a defined hold period also changes how an acquired supplier behaves: investment decisions are weighed against an eventual exit, and roadmap priorities can shift toward margin and cash generation rather than land-grab growth.

The counter-force is that consolidation rarely runs unopposed for long. Every wave that thins the field also creates the conditions for new entrants, as displaced teams spin out and as operators wary of depending on a shrinking set of suppliers deliberately back alternatives. Whether the current phase settles into a stable oligopoly or simply resets the board for the next cycle of challengers is the question that will define the back half of the decade.

The full deal timeline and the numbers behind it are in our State of European iGaming 2026 report.

FAQ

How much iGaming M&A activity has there been since 2025?

Disclosed deal volume across operators, suppliers, affiliates and lottery has passed €20bn since the start of 2025, making it one of the industry’s most active consolidation phases in years.

What is driving the iGaming consolidation wave?

Three forces pulling in the same direction: private-equity funds taking cash-generative, licence-protected suppliers private; lottery mega-mergers such as Allwyn–OPAP; and operators buying specific capability — technology, a market licence or a product — rather than pure scale.

Why are private-equity funds buying gambling suppliers?

Regulated suppliers are cash-generative and licence-protected, and several have traded below the multiple their cash flows would command in private hands, making them attractive take-private targets for funds with long hold periods.

What does consolidation mean for the listed market?

It thins the pool of publicly traded pure-plays, giving investors fewer ways to get exposure to regulated gambling and concentrating capability — and pricing power — in fewer, larger hands.

Sources